nickmura aka bobby

Okay, that individual item endpoint works, but now I realize a bulk method is more important as iteratively calling this endpoint is quite inefficient, and can take up to 5 minutes with an extremely large inventory, so I require the actual steam inspect link via the /bulk POST endpoint. What I did was replace the %owner_steamid% , and %assetid% keywords in the inspect link, so instead of it looking like steam://rungame/730/76561202255233023/+csgo_econ_action_preview%20S%owner_steamid%A%assetid%D10281089380224386840 it now looks like steam://rungame/730/76561202255233023/+csgo_econ_action_preview%20S76561198107078290A36862217483D10281089380224386840 now it works beautifully. Thanks!

I am intending to append the float value for each item in a CEconItem[], and I needed the inspect link in order to access this data, for the https://github.com/csfloat/inspect repository. It states that we need the A, D properties in order to call the endpoint, or a valid inspect link. However, the inspect link returns a value like this from the .actions[] array, steam://rungame/730/76561202255233023/+csgo_econ_action_preview%20S%owner_steamid%A%assetid%D9405817623045777193 the S, and A properties are just filled in with a placeholder, which results in an invalid inspect link and I'm wondering how to resolve this. I tried to derive the A property from the a assetid property on CEconItem (having A & D properties seems to be sufficient) , however the link was still not valid using the tool mentioned above. WIth a valid inspect link Let me know what you think

To reiterate OP, would this be a sufficient method to call for each item in an inventory? Would it be expensive to call this endpoint, 700 times while iterating an inventory? Wouldn't I get rate limited? We want a property to identify the trade hold duration for each item if there is one. Edit: Fixed, missing property on getInventroyContents, `tradableOnly` was set to true, 😭

Maybe my code block was misleading. The problem is with the getKeyBalance(). I'm not very familiar with promises, I'll try implementing in the balance function. thank you

I'm trying to make a function called getKeyBalance, which should return the the amount of a specific item a user has in their inventory. export const getKeyBalance = (manager:TradeOfferManager) => { // returns bots key balance const TF2_KEY_CLASSID = '101785959' let keys = 0 manager.getInventoryContents(TF2_APPID, INV_CONTEXT_ID, true, (err, inv) => { if (!err) { for (let i = 0; i != inv.length; i++) { let item = inv[i] if (String(item.classid) == TF2_KEY_CLASSID) keys++; } console.log('manager.getInventoryContents() keys value:', keys) return keys } else { console.log('getUserKeyBalance error:', err) return 0 } }); } I'm calling it in another function, called `sendBuyOffer()`, export const sendBuyOffer = async (manager:TradeOfferManager, withdraw:any) => { const keys = getKeyBalance(manager); console.log('getKeyBalance returns', keys) if (Number(keys) <= withdraw.keys) { createTradeOffer(manager, withdraw) } } const createTradeOffer = (manager:TradeOfferManager, withdraw:any) => { const offer = manager.createOffer(withdraw.steamid) manager.getInventoryContents(TF2_APPID, INV_CONTEXT_ID, true, (err, inv) => { if (!err) { let keys = 0 for (let i = 0; i != inv.length; i++) { let item = inv[i] if (String(item.classid) == '101785959') { offer.addMyItem(item); keys++; } if (keys == withdraw.keys) break } offer.send((err, status) => { if (err) { console.log(err); return false; } else { console.log(`Sent offer. Status: ${status}.`); return true } }); } return false }); } However, the condition below the `getKeyBalance()` call never runs, because the function doesn't return a value in time. As you can see, the returned value for `getKeyBalance()` is undefined, because the manager.getInventoryContents() doesn't return a value in time. Why isn't this method asynchronous? It would fix this problem entirely. How else can I fix this, without running all the logic at once?

The test successfully logs in, and logOff is not an asynchronous method I thought? Anyways, your opinion is much better than mine, and if it's not a good idea to have a serverless backend, then I don't need to log out I guess. do you think you could you elaborate a bit on why it's bad? Thx

Hello, I'm trying to refactor my service in Svelte-kit, and I've been running into quite tedious errors when testing and initializing a user. Here is a quick test when a user sends a post request, which would initialize the user, run some business logic, and then log off. I've ran essentially the same code in an express environment, with the same environment variables, which worked fine. export const POST = async ({request:request}) => { //TODO const client = new SteamUser(); const community = new SteamCommunity(); const manager = new TradeOfferManager({ steam: client, community: community, language: 'en', }); const cred = { accountName: STEAM_NAME, password: STEAM_PASS, twoFactorCode: SteamTotp.generateAuthCode(STEAM_SHARED), logonID: 12345 }; client.logOn(cred); // logging on client.on('loggedOn', async () => { console.log('logged into steam'); client.setPersona(SteamUser.EPersonaState.Online) }) client.on('webSession', (sessionid, cookies) => { manager.setCookies(cookies); community.setCookies(cookies); community.startConfirmationChecker(12500, STEAM_IDENTITY); }) async function doTradeStuff() { //TODO } //await doTradeStuff() client.logOff(); // logging off client.on('disconnected', async (eresult, msg) => { console.log('logged off steam', eresult, msg) }) return json({place: 'holder'}) } Firstly, in all of the iterations I've made, I keep getting this `Error: LogonSessionReplaced 34`, which your documentation states could be mitigated / prevented by the logonID property when using the logOn method https://github.com/DoctorMcKay/node-steam-user#logondetails. However the issue still persists. Secondly, the logOff method never runs in the serverless environment, as I do not get a disconnected event. https://github.com/DoctorMcKay/node-steam-user#disconnected So, I'm looking for any guidance / hint as to where to look, where I'm going wrong, if there's better practice, what to be aware about if I'm trying to run this in a serverless environment, etc. Thanks for your libraries.

I'm getting a similar issue but it's a 404 error. is the identity secret a bit ephemeral? Don't know exactly what it represents but, getting a 404 error. This code was approving confirmations just fine a month ago. client.on('webSession', (sessionid, cookies) => { manager.setCookies(cookies); community.setCookies(cookies); community.startConfirmationChecker(30000, process.env.STEAM_IDENTITY) community.on('debug', console.log); }) EDIT: I updated my packages, and it's back to working normally. Fixed. Thanks!